PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES

HOUSE OF COMMONS

OFFICIAL REPORT

Third Standing Committee on Statutory Instruments, &c.

DRAFT REDUNDANCY PAYMENTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (MODIFICATION) (AMENDMENT) ORDER 1993

Tuesday 2 March 1993

LONDON: HMSO

£7·50 net

Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in Standing Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office.

No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor's Room, House of Commons.

not later than

Saturday 6 March 1993

STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN STANDING COMMITTEES

© Parliamentary copyright House of Commons 1993

Applications for reproduction should be made to HMSO

HMSO publications are available from:
HMSO Publications Centre HMSO Bookshops HMSO's Accredited Agents
(Mail and telephone orders only) 49 High Holborn, London WC1V 6HB (071) 873 0011 (Counter service only) (see Yellow Pages)
PO Box 276, London SW8 5DT 258 Broad Street, Birmingham B1 2HE (021) 643 3740
Telephone orders 071-873 9090 Southey House, 33 Wine Street, Bristol BS1 2BQ (0272) 264306 and through good booksellers
General enquiries 071-873 0011 9–21 Princess Street, Manchester M60 8AS (061) 834 7201
(queueing system for both numbers in operation) 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD (0232) 238451
71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ (031) 228 4181
Fax orders 071–873 8200
Printed in the U.K. by HMSO

1

The Committee consisted of the following Members:

Chairman: Dr. John G. Blackburn

Boyce, Mr. Jimmy (Rotherham)

Carrington, Mr. Matthew (Fulham)

Clapham, Mr. Michael (Barnsley, West and Penistone)

Eagle, Ms Angela (Wallasey)

Faber, Mr. David (Westbury)

Fishburn, Mr. Dudley (Kensington)

Gale, Mr. Roger (Thanet, North)

Garnier, Mr. Edward (Harborough)

Hague, Mr. William (Richmond, Yorks)

Henderson, Mr. Doug (Newcastle upon Tyne, North)

Jones, Mr. Nigel (Cheltenham)

Khabra, Mr. Piara S. (Ealing, Southall)

McLaughlin, Mr. Patrick (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Employment)

Michell, Mr. Andrew (Gedling)

Olner, Mr. Bill (Nuneaton)

Ottaway, Mr. Richard (Croydon, South)

Prentice, Mrs. Bridget (Lewisham, East)

Robinson, Mr. Mark (Somerton and Frome)

Mr. M. Hennessy, Committee Clerk

2
3 Third Standing Committee on Statutory Instruments, &c. Tuesday 2 March 1993

[DR. JOHN G. BLACKBURN in the Chair]

Draft Redundancy Payments (Local Government) (Modification) (Amendment) Order 1993

10.30 am

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Employment (Mr. Patrick McLoughlin): I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Redundancy Payments (Local Government) (Modification) (Amendment) Order 1993. As the Committee may know, the order is one of a series presented at roughly annual intervals. It is concerned with the calculation of redundancy payments in local government service, and amends the original order passed in 1983 by bringing in some newly created employing bodies. It may be helpful, if I explain that an employee made redundant after at least two years' service is due a payment calculated according to his period of service with his last employer. Local authorities are legally distinct employers, so that, other things being equal, an employee could receive a payment every time he became redundant, even though he moved to another local government job. That would not, however, fairly reflect what normally happens in local government, where normal career progression commonly involves moving from one authority to another, perhaps several times during an individual's working life. Consequently, the law provides for redundancy entitlements to be based on total aggregated service in local government. As there is no convenient definition of what constitutes local government employment, we have to list in the orders all the employers with whom service can count, including many that have gone out of existence following statutory reorganisations. The latest order brings the list up to date by adding a few bodies, mainly in the higher education field, which have recently come into being. I trust that I have said enough to satisfy the Committee that the amendments are necessary, 4 reasonable and uncontroversial. I commend the order to the Committee.

10.32 am

Mr. Doug Henderson (Newcastle upon Tyne, North): I am grateful for the opportunity to respond to the Minister on this matter. I preface my remarks by saying that normally one of the Opposition's spokesmen on employment would be present but, for reasons best known to our Whips' Office, an environment spokesman is filling in this morning. I am grateful to be able to do that, but I should declare an interest as a trade union official who was previously involved in negotiating on behalf of members who were employed in local government. I have some background knowledge. The Opposition support the order for two reasons. We support the principle that persons who are employed and who have given service to the public sector should carry with them the rewards and rights of public sector employment as well as its responsibilities. We support the principle that all public sector service should be taken into account when calculating redundancy payments. Conditions are becoming more difficult for employees in the public sector, many of whom, in local government and allied activities, have found that, instead of having employment for life, because of the changes taking place in local government, they are vulnerable to redundancy and that they need full protection. I hope that the Minister recognises that some of the changes in local government have been caused by Government policy, some of it ideological, some not. More and more the Government are looking for ways of restructuring the public sector by introducing agencies, quangos and other bodies. Increasingly, employees will feel the need for the protection which the order provides. Therefore, the Opposition firmly support the order. I do not suppose that this will be the last such order before the Committee. Several changes in the structure and provision of public service in recent years have been reflected. I anticipate that, because of decisions which have already been made, further orders may be proposed.

Question put and agreed to. Resolved.

That the Committee has considered the draft Redundancy Payments (Local Government) (Modification) (Amendment) Order 1993.

Committee rose at twenty-five minutes to Eleven o'clock.

THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS ATTENDED THE COMMITTEE:

Blackburn, Mr. John D. (Chairman)

Boyce, Mr.

Carrington, Mr.

Eagle, Ms

Faber, Mr.

Fishburn, Mr.

Garnier, Mr.

Hague, Mr.

Henderson, Mr.

Khabra, Mr.

McLoughlin, Mr.

Mitchell, Mr. Andrew

Olner, Mr.

Ottaway, Mr.